An Underestimated Alternative: America and the Limits of "Critical Theory".

The main goal of this paper is to examine the intellectual and biographical reasons why the theorists of the Frankfurt school did not embrace pragmatism, This goal is pursued in four areas: (1) the epistemological area of the debate about subjective and objective "reason"--here the misleading, character of Horkheimer's and Marcuse's writings on pragmatism is demonstrated; (2) the area of political theory--here the tension between the American democratic tradition and a quasi-Marxist functionalism is exposed; (3) the area of social psychology-here the inability of the Frankfurt school to incorporate symbolic interactionism becomes evident; (4) the elitist relationship to American mass culture. The paper ends with brief remarks on Habermas ambivalent position between pragmatism and "Critical Theory" and with a perspective of transcending this ambivalence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]