Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials.

Authors :
Fulcher, Jordan
O'Connell, Rachel
Voysey, Merryn
Emberson, Jonathan
Blackwell, Lisa
Mihaylova, Borislava
Simes, John
Collins, Rory
Kirby, Adrienne
Colhoun, Helen
Braunwald, Eugene
La Rosa, John
Pedersen, T R
Tonkin, Andrew
Davis, Barry
Sleight, Peter
Franzosi, Maria Grazia
Baigent, Colin
Keech, Anthony
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration
Source :
Lancet. 4/11/2015, Vol. 385 Issue 9976, p1397-1405. 9p.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Whether statin therapy is as effective in women as in men is debated, especially for primary prevention. We undertook a meta-analysis of statin trials in the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration database to compare the effects of statin therapy between women and men.<bold>Methods: </bold>We performed meta-analyses on data from 22 trials of statin therapy versus control (n=134,537) and five trials of more-intensive versus less-intensive statin therapy (n=39,612). Effects on major vascular events, major coronary events, stroke, coronary revascularisation and mortality were weighted per 1.0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol and effects in men and women compared with a Cox model that adjusted for non-sex differences. For subgroup analyses, we used 99% CIs to make allowance for the multiplicity of comparisons.<bold>Findings: </bold>46,675 (27%) of 174,149 randomly assigned participants were women. Allocation to a statin had similar absolute effects on 1 year lipid concentrations in both men and women (LDL cholesterol reduced by about 1.1 mmol/L in statin vs control trials and roughly 0.5 mmol/L for more-intensive vs less-intensive therapy). Women were generally at lower cardiovascular risk than were men in these trials. The proportional reductions per 1.0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol in major vascular events were similar overall for women (rate ratio [RR] 0.84, 99% CI 0.78-0.91) and men (RR 0.78, 99% CI 0.75-0.81, adjusted p value for heterogeneity by sex=0.33) and also for those women and men at less than 10% predicted 5 year absolute cardiovascular risk (adjusted heterogeneity p=0.11). Likewise, the proportional reductions in major coronary events, coronary revascularisation, and stroke did not differ significantly by sex. No adverse effect on rates of cancer incidence or non-cardiovascular mortality was noted for either sex. These net benefits translated into all-cause mortality reductions with statin therapy for both women (RR 0.91, 99% CI 0.84-0.99) and men (RR 0.90, 99% CI 0.86-0.95; adjusted heterogeneity p=0.43).<bold>Interpretation: </bold>In men and women at an equivalent risk of cardiovascular disease, statin therapy is of similar effectiveness for the prevention of major vascular events.<bold>Funding: </bold>UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, European Community Biomed Program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01406736
Volume :
385
Issue :
9976
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Lancet
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
107783110
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61368-4