Back to Search Start Over

Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).

Authors :
Goldenberg I
Moss AJ
Hall WJ
Foster E
Goldberger JJ
Santucci P
Shinn T
Solomon S
Steinberg JS
Wilber D
Barsheshet A
McNitt S
Zareba W
Klein H
MADIT-CRT Executive Committee
Goldenberg, Ilan
Moss, Arthur J
Hall, W Jackson
Foster, Elyse
Goldberger, Jeffrey J
Source :
Circulation. 10/4/2011, Vol. 124 Issue 14, p1527-1536. 10p.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>We hypothesized that combined assessment of factors that are associated with favorable reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization-defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) can be used to predict clinical response to the device. <bold>Methods and Results: </bold>The study population comprised 1761 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Best-subset regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with echocardiographic response (defined as percent reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume 1 year after CRT-D implantation) and to create a response score. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate the CRT-D versus defibrillator-only reduction in the risk of heart failure or death by the response score. Seven factors were identified as associated with echocardiographic response to CRT-D and made up the response score (female sex, nonischemic origin, left bundle-branch block, QRS ≥150 milliseconds, prior hospitalization for heart failure, left ventricular end-diastolic volume ≥125 mL/m(2), and left atrial volume <40 mL/m(2)). Multivariate analysis showed a 13% (P<0.001) increase in the clinical benefit of CRT-D per 1-point increment in the response score (range, 0-14) and a significant direct correlation between risk reduction associated with CRT-D and response score quartiles: Patients in the first quartile did not derive a significant reduction in the risk of heart failure or death with CRT-D (hazard ratio=0.87; P=0.52); patients in the second and third quartiles derived 33% (P=0.04) and 36% (P=0.03) risk reductions, respectively; and patients in the upper quartile experienced a 69% (P<0.001) risk reduction (P for trend=0.005). <bold>Conclusion: </bold>Combined assessment of factors associated with reverse remodeling can be used for improved selection of patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00180271. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00097322
Volume :
124
Issue :
14
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Circulation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
108200475
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014324