Back to Search Start Over

Salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for transformed indolent lymphoma: a subset analysis of NCIC CTG LY12.

Authors :
Kuruvilla, John
MacDonald, David A.
Kouroukis, C. Tom
Cheung, Matthew
Olney, Harold J.
Turner, Robert
Anglin, Peter
Seftel, Matthew
Ismail, Walid Sabry
Luminari, Stefano
Couban, Stephen
Baetz, Tara
Meyer, Ralph M.
Hay, Annette E.
Shepherd, Lois
Djurfeldt, Marina S.
Alamoudi, Sameer
Chen, Bingshu E.
Crump, Michael
Source :
Blood. 8/6/2015, Vol. 126 Issue 6, p733-738. 6p.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

The treatment of transformed indolent lymphoma (TRIL) often includes salvage chemotherapy (SC) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). NCIC CTG LY12 is a randomized phase 3 trial comparing gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) with dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) before ASCT. This analysis compares the results of SC and ASCT for TRIL with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Six-hundred nineteen patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma were randomized to GDP or DHAP; 87 patients (14%) had TRIL and 429 (69%) had DLBCL. The response rate to SC was 47% in TRIL and 45% in DL (P = .81). Transplantation rates were similar: TRIL 53% and DL 52% (P = 1.0). With a median follow-up of 53 months, 4 year overall survival was 39% for TRIL and 41% for DL (P = .78); 4 year event-free survival (EFS) was 27% for TRIL and 27% for DL (P = .83). Post-ASCT, 4-year EFS was 45% for TRIL and 46% for DL. Histology (TRIL or DL) was not a predictor of any outcome in multivariate models. Patients with relapsed or refractory TRIL and DLBCL have similar outcomes with SC and ASCT; this therapy should be considered the standard of care for patients with TRIL who have received prior systemic chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00064971
Volume :
126
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Blood
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
108869917
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-01-622084