Back to Search Start Over

First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label, ENSURE study.

Authors :
Wu, Y. -L.
Zhou, C.
Liam, C. -K.
Wu, G.
Liu, X.
Zhong, Z.
Lu, S.
Cheng, Y.
Han, B.
Chen, L.
Huang, C.
Qin, S.
Zhu, Y.
Pan, H.
Liang, H.
Li, E.
Jiang, G.
How, S. H.
Fernando, M. C. L.
Zhang, Y.
Source :
Annals of Oncology. Sep2015, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p1883-1889. 7p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: The phase III, randomized, open-label ENSURE study (NCT01342965) evaluated first-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) in patients from China, Malaysia and the Philippines with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Patients ≥18 years old with histologically/cytologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 were randomized 1:1 to receive erlotinib (oral; 150 mg once daily until progression/unacceptable toxicity) or GP [G 1250 mg/m² i.v. days 1 and 8 (3-weekly cycle); P 75 mg/m² i.v. day 1, (3-weekly cycle) for up to four cycles]. Primary end point: investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Other end points include objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: A total of 217 patients were randomized: 110 to erlotinib and 107 to GP. Investigator-assessed median PFS was 11.0 months versus 5.5 months, erlotinib versus GP, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.51; log-rank P < 0.0001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed median PFS was consistent (HR, 0.42). Median OS was 26.3 versus 25.5 months, erlotinib versus GP, respectively (HR, 0.91, 95% CI 0.63-1.31; log-rank P = .607). ORR was 62.7% for erlotinib and 33.6% for GP. Treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 2.7% versus 10.6% of erlotinib and GP patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were rash (6.4%) with erlotinib, and neutropenia (25.0%), leukopenia (14.4%), and anemia (12.5%) with GP. Conclusion: These analyses demonstrate that first-line erlotinib provides a statistically significant improvement in PFS versus GP in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (NCT01342965). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09237534
Volume :
26
Issue :
9
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Annals of Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
109519741
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv270