Cite
Seven-Year Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Disc Replacement versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results from Investigational Device Exemption and Post-Approval Studies of ProDisc®-C Total Disc Replacement.
MLA
Radcliff, Kris E., et al. “Seven-Year Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Disc Replacement versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results from Investigational Device Exemption and Post-Approval Studies of ProDisc®-C Total Disc Replacement.” Spine Journal, vol. 15, no. 10, Oct. 2015, pp. S130–31. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.122.
APA
Radcliff, K. E., Lerner, J. H., Bernard, T., Yang, C., & Zigler, J. E. (2015). Seven-Year Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Disc Replacement versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results from Investigational Device Exemption and Post-Approval Studies of ProDisc®-C Total Disc Replacement. Spine Journal, 15(10), S130–S131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.122
Chicago
Radcliff, Kris E., Jason H. Lerner, Thierry Bernard, Chao Yang, and Jack E. Zigler. 2015. “Seven-Year Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Disc Replacement versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results from Investigational Device Exemption and Post-Approval Studies of ProDisc®-C Total Disc Replacement.” Spine Journal 15 (10): S130–31. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.122.