Back to Search Start Over

Mechanical and energetic consequences of reduced ankle plantar-flexion in human walking.

Authors :
Tzu-wei P. Huang
Shorter, Kenneth A.
Adamczyk, Peter G.
Kuo, Arthur D.
Source :
Journal of Experimental Biology. Nov2015, Vol. 218 Issue 22, p3541-3550. 10p.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

The human ankle produces a large burst of 'push-off' mechanical power late in the stance phase of walking, reduction of which leads to considerably poorer energy economy. It is, however, uncertain whether the energetic penalty results from poorer efficiency when the other leg joints substitute for the ankle's push-off work, or from a higher overall demand for work due to some fundamental feature of push-off. Here, we show that greater metabolic energy expenditure is indeed explained by a greater demand for work. This is predicted by a simple model of walking on pendulum-like legs, because proper push-off reduces collision losses from the leading leg. We tested this by experimentally restricting ankle push-off bilaterally in healthy adults (N=8) walking on a treadmill at 1.4 m s-1, using ankle-foot orthoses with steel cables limiting motion. These produced up to (~50% reduction in ankle push off power and work, resulting in up to ~50%greater net metabolic power expenditure to walk at the same speed. For each 1 J reduction in ankle work, we observed 0.6 J more dissipative collision work by the other leg, 1.3 J more positive work from the leg joints overall, and 3.94 J more metabolic energy expended. Loss of ankle push-off required more positive work elsewhere to maintain walking speed; this additional work was performed by the knee, apparently at reasonably high efficiency. Ankle push-off may contribute to walking economy by reducing dissipative collision losses and thus overall work demand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00220949
Volume :
218
Issue :
22
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Experimental Biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
111166432
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.113910