Back to Search Start Over

Misoprostol for primary versus secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a cluster-randomised non-inferiority community trial.

Authors :
Raghavan, S
Geller, S
Miller, S
Goudar, SS
Anger, H
Yadavannavar, MC
Dabash, R
Bidri, SR
Gudadinni, MR
Udgiri, R
Koch, AR
Bellad, MB
Winikoff, B
Goudar, S S
Yadavannavar, M C
Bidri, S R
Gudadinni, M R
Koch, A R
Bellad, M B
Source :
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Jan2016, Vol. 123 Issue 1, p120-127. 8p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>To assess whether secondary prevention, which preemptively treats women with above-average postpartum bleeding, is non-inferior to universal prophylaxis.<bold>Design: </bold>A cluster-randomised non-inferiority community trial.<bold>Setting: </bold>Health sub-centres and home deliveries in the Bijapur district of Karnataka, India.<bold>Population: </bold>Women with low-risk pregnancies who were eligible for delivery with an Auxiliary Nurse Midwife at home or sub-centre and who consented to be part of the study.<bold>Methods: </bold>Auxiliary Nurse Midwifes were randomised to secondary prevention using 800 mcg sublingual misoprostol administered to women with postpartum blood loss ≥350 ml or to universal prophylaxis using 600 mcg oral misoprostol administered to all women during the third stage of labour.<bold>Main Outcome Measures: </bold>Postpartum haemoglobin ≤7.8 g/dl, mean postpartum blood loss and postpartum haemoglobin, postpartum haemorrhage rate, transfer to higher-level facilities, acceptability and feasibility of the intervention.<bold>Results: </bold>Misoprostol was administered to 99.7% of women as primary prevention. In secondary prevention, 92 (4.7%) women had postpartum bleeding ≥350 ml, of which 90 (97.8%) received misoprostol. The proportion of women with postpartum haemoglobin ≤7.8 g/dl was 5.9 and 8.8% in secondary and primary prevention clusters, respectively [difference -2.9%, one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) <1.3%]. Postpartum transfer and haemorrhage rates were low (<1%) in both groups. Shivering was more common in primary prevention clusters (P = 0.013).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage with misoprostol is non-inferior to universal prophylaxis based on the primary outcome of postpartum haemoglobin. Secondary prevention could be a good alternative to universal prophylaxis as it medicates fewer women and is an acceptable and feasible strategy at the community level.<bold>Tweetable Abstract: </bold>Secondary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage with misoprostol is non-inferior to universal prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14700328
Volume :
123
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
112000324
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13540