Multiaxial vibration fatigue—A theoretical and experimental comparison.

Random vibration excitation is a common cause of failure, especially if natural dynamics is excited. The high-cycle vibration-fatigue analysis typically requires the structural dynamics analysis, the response analysis and the fatigue analysis. The material parameters (S–N curve) are obtained at uniaxial stress state. However, in real structures the stress state is rarely uniaxial and the direct application of the S–N curve is difficult. The stress tensor is reduced to a more manageable representation using a multiaxial criterion. In this study, maximum normal stress, maximum shear stress, maximum normal-and-shear stress, C–S criterion, Projection-by- Projection and the Preumont and Piéfort criterion for multiaxial stress state are compared theoretically and experimentally. The crack location and the time-to-failure were compared. The time-to-failure was found relatively accurate with all multiaxial criteria; however, the crack-location estimation was found not to be accurate enough for either of the compared criteria. The study proves the applicability of the vibration-fatigue analysis procedure on real vibrating structures with rich structural dynamics. Random vibration excitation is a common cause of failure, especially if natural dynamics is excited. The high-cycle vibration-fatigue analysis typically requires the structural dynamics analysis, the response analysis and the fatigue analysis. The material parameters (S–N curve) are obtained at uniaxial stress state. However, in real structures the stress state is rarely uniaxial and the direct application of the S–N curve is difficult. The stress tensor is reduced to a more manageable representation using a multiaxial criterion. In this study, maximum normal stress, maximum shear stress, maximum normaland-shear stress, C–S criterion, Projection-by-Projection and the Preumont and Piéfort criterion for multiaxial stress state are compared theoretically and experimentally. The crack location and the time-to-failure were compared. The time-to-failure was found relatively accurate with all multiaxial criteria; however, the crack-location estimation was found not to be accurate enough for either of the compared criteria. The study proves the applicability of the vibration-fatigue analysis procedure on real vibrating structures with rich structural dynamics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]