Înțelesuri și subînțelesuri în receptarea actuală a lui Mihai Eminescu.

The present paper aims to change the place of Eminescu's up-to-dateness from the arena of publicistic debate to a more proper field for academic analysis. My meeting, as a cultural person, with an old writer's work doesn't have anything to do with the literature museum, but it takes place on the way. As a receiver, I'm on the way of my formation, with accumulations, with prejudices already fixed in the "geological" layers of my inner self. In a special manner, the creator is on the way, having a short or long history of his immortality. Here is the concept of immortality (philosophical, metaliterary), of Platonic essence, refreshed in the Romantic Age, then retrieved in the speech of the literary historiography - even if with metaphorical load - in order to signify that author's posterity, the story of this reception in diacrony. It is an old observation of the literary sociology that a creator gets appearances by which each generation identifies him and makes him their contemporany. However, not many writers (who are meant to have a posterity) undergo extreme metamorphoses. What has happened with Eminescu's posterity in the last decades? Diverse interrogative nuances and diverse attempts to answer these questions will form the contents of the present paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]