Back to Search
Start Over
Academic Journals and Sociology's Big Divide: a Modest But Radical Proposal.
- Source :
-
American Sociologist . Sep2016, Vol. 47 Issue 2/3, p289-301. 13p. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Submitting articles to journals has become a difficult and time-consuming process, as has reviewing and re-reviewing articles that too often get the dreaded R&R letter. The underlying problem here is as old as the discipline, particularly in American sociology. Very different criteria are used in producing scholarship and reviewing its merits for publication; and current ways of editing journals aggravate this fundamental problem. The Big Divide in sociology is between a discipline that seeks to be a science and one that does not; and there is no easy reconciliation among those on either side of this divide. In this paper, the effects of this divide on journal publishing are reviewed in terms of the consequences of the Big Divide for the discipline. A simple but radical proposal is offered at the end for how sociologists can be put out over their misery in having to deal with the consequences of this Big Divide in their departments, in professional meetings, and most importantly, in publishing their intellectual products in journals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00031232
- Volume :
- 47
- Issue :
- 2/3
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- American Sociologist
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 116747867
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9296-3