Back to Search Start Over

Using an inexpensive color sensor for rapid assessment of soil organic carbon.

Authors :
Stiglitz, Roxanne
Mikhailova, Elena
Post, Christopher
Schlautman, Mark
Sharp, Julia
Source :
Geoderma. Jan2017, Vol. 286, p98-103. 6p.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Quantifying soil organic carbon (SOC) is important for soil management, precision agriculture, soil mapping and carbon dynamics research. Inexpensive sensor technologies offer the potential for rapid quantification of SOC in laboratory samples as well as in the field. The objective of this study was to use a commercially-available color sensor to develop SOC prediction models for both dry and moist soils from the Piedmont region of South Carolina. Thirty-one soil samples were analyzed for lightness to darkness, redness to greenness, and yellowness to blueness (CIEL*a*b*) color using a Nix Pro™ color sensor. Soil color was measured under both dry and moist soil conditions and the depth of each soil sample was also recorded. Using L*, a*, b* and soil depth for each sample as initial predictors, regression analyses were conducted to develop SOC prediction models for dry and moist soils. The resulting residual plots, root mean squared errors (RMSE), and coefficients of determination (R 2 ) were used to assess model fits for predicting the SOC content of soil. Cross validation was conducted to determine the efficiency of the predictive models and the mean squared prediction error (MSPE) was calculated. The final models included soil depth, L*, and a* as independent variables (dry soils R 2 = 0.7978 and MSPE = 0.0819, moist soils R 2 = 0.7254 and MSPE = 0.1536). The results suggest that soil color sensors have potential for rapid SOC determination, and soil depth and color are useful in predicting SOC content in soils. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00167061
Volume :
286
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Geoderma
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
119417406
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.027