Back to Search Start Over

Le contrôle des coûts est-il compatible avec des bons résultats en fécondation in vitro ?

Authors :
Ecra, Ana Touré
Dechanet, Clotilde
Dechaud, Hervé
Reyftmann, Lionel
Brunet, Cécile
Traverso, Magalie
Hamamah, Samir
Hédon, Bernard
Source :
MT: Médecine de la Reproduction, Gynécologie et Endocrinologie. jui-sep2016, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p228-233. 6p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Introduction: Infertility in developing countries are mainly due to tubal injuries, making essential IVF; IVF costs but this, should be reduced to be accessible to people, and not be seen as a luxury in this part of the world but rather an psycho-social emergency. Simplifying attempts monitoring means can decrease these costs, provided that the results are not altered. Patients: The authors, through this randomized survey led in the Academic Hospital Arnaud de Villeneuve in Montpellier, compare the results of 118 patients admitted to an IVF embryo transfer program. Agonist or antagonist protocols are used for ovarian stimulation. The study patients are followed up by traditional monitoring or single day monitoring. Results: Pregnancy rates are equals in both groups: traditional and unique monitoring. Single day monitoring is twice less expensive than the traditional one. Conclusion: single day monitoring doesn't affect IVF outcome and is less expensive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
French
ISSN :
12959359
Volume :
18
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
MT: Médecine de la Reproduction, Gynécologie et Endocrinologie
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
119619982
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1684/mte.2016.0621