Back to Search Start Over

NEOPLASM study: Real-life use of lacosamide in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy.

Authors :
Villanueva, Vicente
Saiz-Diaz, Rosana
Toledo, Manuel
Piera, Ana
Mauri, Jose Angel
Rodriguez-Uranga, Juan Jesús
López-González, Francisco Javier
Gómez-Ibáñez, Asier
Garcés, Mercedes
González de la Aleja, Jesús
Rodríguez-Osorio, Xiana
Palao-Duarte, Susana
Castillo, Ascensión
Bonet, Macarena
Ruiz-Giménez, Jesús
Palau, Juan
Arcediano, Alberto
Toledo, Maria
Gago, Ana
Source :
Epilepsy & Behavior. Dec2016, Vol. 65, p25-32. 8p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background The choice of antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is complicated, and there are a lack of robust clinical trial data to date. Methods The NEOPLASM (Neuroncologic Patients treated with LAcoSaMide) study was a 6-month, multicenter, retrospective, observational study in patients with BTRE treated with lacosamide. Patients were started on lacosamide because of a lack of efficacy or adverse events (AEs) with prior AEDs or suitability versus other AEDs, according to clinical practice. The primary efficacy variable was the seizure-free rate at 6 months. Safety variables included the proportion of patients with an AE and the proportion with an AE that led to discontinuation. Results Overall, 105 patients from 14 hospital centers were included in the analysis. Treatment with lacosamide for 6 months resulted in a 30.8% seizure-free rate, and 66.3% of patients had a ≥ 50% seizure reduction (responders). In the subset of patients included because of a lack of efficacy with prior AEDs, seizure-free rates were 28.0%, and 66.7% of patients were responders. No statistically significant differences in efficacy were observed according to the mechanism of action or enzyme-inducing properties of concomitant AEDs. Adverse events were reported by 41.9% of patients at 6 months, and 4.7% of them led to discontinuation. The most common AEs were somnolence/fatigue and dizziness. Notably, 57.1% of the patients who were switched to lacosamide because of AEs with their previous therapy did not report any AE at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions In this open-label, observational study, lacosamide appeared to be effective and well tolerated in a large population of patients with BTRE. Lacosamide may therefore be a promising option for the treatment of patients with BTRE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15255050
Volume :
65
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Epilepsy & Behavior
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
120148279
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.09.033