Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic Accuracy of Central Venous Catheter Confirmation by Bedside Ultrasound Versus Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors :
Ablordeppey, Enyo A.
Drewry, Anne M.
Beyer, Alexander B.
Theodoro, Daniel L.
Fowler, Susan A.
Fuller, Brian M.
Carpenter, Christopher R.
Source :
Critical Care Medicine. Apr2017, Vol. 45 Issue 4, p715-724. 10p.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the accuracy of bedside ultrasound for confirmation of central venous catheter position and exclusion of pneumothorax compared with chest radiography.<bold>Data Sources: </bold>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, reference lists, conference proceedings and ClinicalTrials.gov.<bold>Study Selection: </bold>Articles and abstracts describing the diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasound compared with chest radiography for confirmation of central venous catheters in sufficient detail to reconstruct 2 × 2 contingency tables were reviewed. Primary outcomes included the accuracy of confirming catheter positioning and detecting a pneumothorax. Secondary outcomes included feasibility, interrater reliability, and efficiency to complete bedside ultrasound confirmation of central venous catheter position.<bold>Data Extraction: </bold>Investigators abstracted study details including research design and sonographic imaging technique to detect catheter malposition and procedure-related pneumothorax. Diagnostic accuracy measures included pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio.<bold>Data Synthesis: </bold>Fifteen studies with 1,553 central venous catheter placements were identified with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of catheter malposition by ultrasound of 0.82 (0.77-0.86) and 0.98 (0.97-0.99), respectively. The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios of catheter malposition by ultrasound were 31.12 (14.72-65.78) and 0.25 (0.13-0.47). The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for pneumothorax detection was nearly 100% in the participating studies. Bedside ultrasound reduced mean central venous catheter confirmation time by 58.3 minutes. Risk of bias and clinical heterogeneity in the studies were high.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Bedside ultrasound is faster than radiography at identifying pneumothorax after central venous catheter insertion. When a central venous catheter malposition exists, bedside ultrasound will identify four out of every five earlier than chest radiography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00903493
Volume :
45
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Critical Care Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
122030034
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002188