Back to Search Start Over

When “Optimal Filtering” Isn’t.

Authors :
Fowler, J. W.
Alpert, B. K.
Doriese, W. B.
Hays-Wehle, J.
Joe, Y.-i.
Morgan, K. M.
O'neil, G. C.
Reintsema, C. D.
Schmidt, D. R.
Ullom, J. N.
Swetz, D. S.
Source :
IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. Jun2017 Part 1, Vol. 27 Issue 4, Part 1, p1-4. 4p.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

The so-called “optimal filter” analysis of a microcalorimeter's x-ray pulses is statistically optimal only if all pulses have the same shape, regardless of energy. However, the shapes of pulses from a nonlinear detector can and do depend on the pulse energy. A pulse-fitting procedure that we call “tangent filtering” accounts for the energy dependence of the shape and should, therefore, achieve superior energy resolution. We take a geometric view of the pulse-fitting problem and give expressions to predict how much the energy resolution stands to benefit from such a procedure. We also demonstrate the method with a case study of K-line fluorescence from several 3d transition metals. The method improves the resolution from 4.9 to 4.2 eV at the Cu K $\alpha$ line (8.0 keV). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10518223
Volume :
27
Issue :
4, Part 1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
124145836
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2016.2637359