Back to Search Start Over

The impact of human papillomavirus type on colposcopy performance in women offered HPV immunisation in a catch-up vaccine programme: a two-centre observational study.

Authors :
Munro, A
Gillespie, C
Cotton, S
Busby‐Earle, C
Kavanagh, K
Cuschieri, K
Cubie, H
Robertson, C
Smart, L
Pollock, K
Moore, C
Palmer, T
Cruickshank, ME
Busby-Earle, C
Cruickshank, M E
Source :
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Aug2017, Vol. 124 Issue 9, p1394-1401. 8p. 3 Charts, 1 Graph.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>To determine whether human papillomavirus (HPV) immunisation has affected the prevalence of HPV genotypes and colposcopic features of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in young women referred for colposcopy.<bold>Design: </bold>A two-centre observational study including vaccinated and unvaccinated women.<bold>Setting: </bold>Colposcopy clinics serving two health regions in Scotland, UK.<bold>Population: </bold>A total of 361 women aged 20-25 years attending colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cytology result at routine cervical screening.<bold>Methods: </bold>Cervical samples were obtained from women for HPV DNA genotyping and mRNA E6/E7 expression of HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45. Demographic data, cytology, and histology results and colposcopic features were recorded. Chi-square analysis was conducted to identify associations between vaccine status, HPV genotypes, and colposcopic features.<bold>Main Outcome Measures: </bold>Colposcopic features, HPV genotypes, mRNA expression, and cervical histology.<bold>Results: </bold>The prevalence of HPV 16 was significantly lower in the vaccinated group (8.6%) compared with the unvaccinated group (46.7%) (P = 0.001). The number of cases of CIN2+ was significantly lower in women who had been vaccinated (P = 0.006). The HPV vaccine did not have a statistically significant effect on commonly recognised colposcopic features, but there was a slight reduction in the positive predictive value (PPV) of colposcopy for CIN2+, from 74% (unvaccinated) to 66.7% (vaccinated).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In this group of young women with abnormal cytology referred to colposcopy, HPV vaccination via a catch-up programme reduced the prevalence of CIN2+ and HPV 16 infection. The reduced PPV of colposcopy for the detection of CIN2+ in women who have been vaccinated is at the lower acceptable level of the UK national cervical screening programme guidelines.<bold>Tweetable Abstract: </bold>Reduction of hrHPV positivity and CIN in immunised women consistent with lower PPV of colposcopy for CIN2+. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14700328
Volume :
124
Issue :
9
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
124220603
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14563