Back to Search Start Over

A blinded determination of H0 from low-redshift Type Ia supernovae, calibrated by Cepheid variables.

Authors :
Zhang, Bonnie R.
Childress, Michael J.
Davis, Tamara M.
Karpenka, Natallia V.
Lidman, Chris
Schmidt, Brian P.
Smith, Mathew
Source :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Oct2017, Vol. 471 Issue 2, p2254-2285. 32p.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Presently, a>3σ tension exists between values of the Hubble constant H0 derived from analysis of fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background by Planck, and local measurements of the expansion using calibrators of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). We perform a blinded reanalysis of Riess et al. (2011) to measure H0 from low-redshift SNe Ia, calibrated by Cepheid variables and geometric distances including to NGC 4258. This paper is a demonstration of techniques to be applied to the Riess et al. (2016) data. Our end-to-end analysis starts from available Harvard -Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA3) and Lick Observatory Supernova Search (LOSS) photometries, providing an independent validation of Riess et al. (2011). We obscure the value of H0 throughout our analysis and the first stage of the referee process, because calibration of SNe Ia requires a series of often subtle choices, and the potential for results to be affected by human bias is significant. Our analysis departs from that of Riess et al. (2011) by incorporating the covariance matrix method adopted in Supernova Legacy Survey and Joint Lightcurve Analysis to quantify SN Ia systematics, and by including a simultaneous fit of all SN Ia and Cepheid data. We find H0 = 72.5 ± 3.1(stat) ± 0.77(sys) km s-1 Mpc-1 with a three-galaxy (NGC 4258+LMC+MW) anchor. The relative uncertainties are 4.3 per cent statistical, 1.1 per cent systematic, and 4.4 per cent total, larger than in Riess et al. (2011) (3.3 per cent total) and the Efstathiou (2014) re-analysis (3.4 per cent total). Our error budget for H0 is dominated by statistical errors due to the small size of the SN sample, whilst the systematic contribution is dominated by variation in the Cepheid fits, and for the SNe Ia, uncertainties in the host galaxy mass dependence and Malmquist bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00358711
Volume :
471
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
124983866
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1600