Back to Search Start Over

Overcoming severe adverse reactions to venom immunotherapy using anti-Ig E antibodies in combination with a high maintenance dose.

Authors :
Stretz, E.
Oppel, E. M.
Räwer, H.‐C.
Chatelain, R.
Mastnik, S.
Przybilla, B.
Ruëff, F.
Source :
Clinical & Experimental Allergy. Dec2017, Vol. 47 Issue 12, p1631-1639. 9p.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background An omalizumab treatment and a high maintenance venom dose may both help to prevent recurrent systemic allergic reactions ( SAR) to venom immunotherapy ( VIT). The effectiveness of this combination therapy, however, is unclear. Objective We wanted to explore the possibility whether a temporary treatment with the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab combined with a VIT using an elevated maintenance dose of >100 μg venom may establish a permanent tolerance of maintenance VIT. Methods For this retrospective case series, we scoured our institutional data base for patients who had had an insect venom allergy, and in whom it had not been possible to continue VIT because of repeated unstoppable SAR during maintenance VIT. Patients were divided into those who had received the combination therapy (omalizumab group) and those who had not received omalizumab because its costs could not be covered (controls). Guided by the total IgE level and by body weight, omalizumab had been given subcutaneously 5, 3 and 1 weeks before VIT had been restarted. Three to 6 months after an elevated maintenance dose (200-300 μg venom) had been reached, omalizumab had been stopped. Results Between 2006 and 2011, 15 patients had qualified for an off-label use of omalizumab: 10 patients had received the combination therapy, and 5 patients had remained without such a therapy. The combination therapy leads to a durable tolerance of VIT in all patients even after omalizumab had been discontinued (median of follow-up time 5.8 years, IQR 2.7-8.6 years). Sting challenge tests were tolerated by all of the re-stung omalizumab patients (n = 8). In all controls, VIT had to be stopped permanently due to repeated SARs ( P < .001 vs omalizumab group). Conclusions and Clinical Relevance Combining a temporary omalizumab therapy with an elevated maintenance dose seems a promising approach to achieve a tolerance of treatment in patients with a recurrent SAR to VIT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09547894
Volume :
47
Issue :
12
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
126462104
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12997