Back to Search Start Over

Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.

Authors :
Wissman, Kathryn T.
Rawson, Katherine A.
Source :
Memory. Apr2018, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p406-414. 9p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Arnold and McDermott [(2013). Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of testing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,39, 940–945] isolated the indirect effects of testing and concluded that encoding is enhanced to a greater extent following more versus fewer practice tests, referred to astest-potentiated learning. The current research provided further evidence for test-potentiated learning and evaluated thecovert retrieval hypothesisas an alternative explanation for the observed effect. Learners initially studied foreign language word pairs and then completed either one or five practice tests before restudy occurred. Results of greatest interest concern performance on test trials following restudy for items that were not correctly recalled on the test trials that preceded restudy. Results replicate Arnold and McDermott (2013) by demonstrating that more versus fewer tests potentiate learning when trial time is limited. Results also provide strong evidence against thecovert retrieval hypothesisconcerning why the effect occurs (i.e., it does not reflect differential covert retrieval during pre-restudy trials). In addition, outcomes indicate that the magnitude of the test-potentiated learning effect decreases as trial length increases, revealing an unexpected boundary condition to test-potentiated learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09658211
Volume :
26
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Memory
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
127893728
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1350717