Back to Search Start Over

Measuring the Psychosocial Dimensions of Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Psychometrics of the German Quality of Life at the End of Life-Cancer-Psychosocial Questionnaire.

Authors :
Grünke, Britta
Philipp, Rebecca
Vehling, Sigrun
Scheffold, Katharina
Härter, Martin
Oechsle, Karin
Schulz-Kindermann, Frank
Mehnert, Anja
Lo, Christopher
Source :
Journal of Pain & Symptom Management. Mar2018, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p985-991.e1. 1p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

<bold>Context: </bold>Quality of life (QoL) is a central focus of care in advanced cancer. Specialized instruments, such as the Quality of Life at the End of Life-Cancer (QUAL-EC), may be useful to assess psychosocial issues associated with QoL unique to this population.<bold>Objectives: </bold>To evaluate the measurement of the psychosocial dimensions of QoL using the German translation of the QUAL-EC-Psychosocial (QUAL-EC-P) questionnaire, including factor structure and psychometrics.<bold>Methods: </bold>About 183 patients with advanced cancer from the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and University Medical Center Leipzig completed the QUAL-EC-P questionnaire. We conducted exploratory factor analysis as well as item and reliability analysis. We examined convergent validity with correlations between the scale and relevant psychological constructs.<bold>Results: </bold>The sample was 60% female with mean age of 57.7 (SD = 11.7). We extracted three factors accounting for 44% of the variance aligning with the structure of the instrument. The QUAL-EC-P questionnaire showed good to acceptable internal consistency for the QoL-psychosocial total score (α = 0.77), the Life completion subscale (α = 0.77), and the Relationship with health care provider subscale (α = 0.81). The Preparation for end of life subscale had adequate albeit low internal consistency (α = 0.64) because concerns about family were less associated with financial worry and fear of death than expected. The psychosocial dimensions of QoL correlated negatively with depression (r = -0.27, P ≤ 0.001), anxiety (r = -0.32, P ≤ 0.001), demoralization (r = -0.63, P ≤ 0.001), and attachment insecurity (r = -0.51, P ≤ 0.001) and positively with spiritual well-being (r = 0.63, P ≤ 0.001).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The QUAL-EC-P questionnaire may be used to assess the psychosocial aspects of QoL and promote their clinical discussion in patients with advanced cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08853924
Volume :
55
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Pain & Symptom Management
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
128203555
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.11.006