Back to Search Start Over

Towards a new classification of stable phase schizophrenia into major and simple neuro‐cognitive psychosis: Results of unsupervised machine learning analysis.

Authors :
Kanchanatawan, Buranee
Sriswasdi, Sira
Thika, Supaksorn
Stoyanov, Drozdstoy
Sirivichayakul, Sunee
Carvalho, André F.
Geffard, Michel
Maes, Michael
Source :
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. Aug2018, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p879-891. 13p. 2 Diagrams, 4 Charts, 1 Graph.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Abstract: Rationale: Deficit schizophrenia, as defined by the Schedule for Deficit Syndrome, may represent a distinct diagnostic class defined by neurocognitive impairments coupled with changes in IgA/IgM responses to tryptophan catabolites (TRYCATs). Adequate classifications should be based on supervised and unsupervised learning rather than on consensus criteria. Methods: This study used machine learning as means to provide a more accurate classification of patients with stable phase schizophrenia. Results: We found that using negative symptoms as discriminatory variables, schizophrenia patients may be divided into two distinct classes modelled by (A) impairments in IgA/IgM responses to noxious and generally more protective tryptophan catabolites, (B) impairments in episodic and semantic memory, paired associative learning and false memory creation, and (C) psychotic, excitation, hostility, mannerism, negative, and affective symptoms. The first cluster shows increased negative, psychotic, excitation, hostility, mannerism, depression and anxiety symptoms, and more neuroimmune and cognitive disorders and is therefore called “major neurocognitive psychosis” (MNP). The second cluster, called “simple neurocognitive psychosis” (SNP) is discriminated from normal controls by the same features although the impairments are less well developed than in MNP. The latter is additionally externally validated by lowered quality of life, body mass (reflecting a leptosome body type), and education (reflecting lower cognitive reserve). Conclusions: Previous distinctions including “type 1” (positive)/“type 2” (negative) and DSM‐IV‐TR (eg, paranoid) schizophrenia could not be validated using machine learning techniques. Previous names of the illness, including schizophrenia, are not very adequate because they do not describe the features of the illness, namely, interrelated neuroimmune, cognitive, and clinical features. Stable‐phase schizophrenia consists of 2 relevant qualitatively distinct categories or nosological entities with SNP being a less well‐developed phenotype, while MNP is the full blown phenotype or core illness. Major neurocognitive psychosis and SNP should be added to the DSM‐5 and incorporated into the Research Domain Criteria project. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13561294
Volume :
24
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
130994057
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12945