Evaluation of soil resistance formulations for estimates of sensible heat flux in a desert vineyard.

For irrigated vineyards, accurate estimates of the sensible heat flux from the soil surface ( H s ) is essential for determining the contribution of soil evaporation (E) to evapotranspiration (ET) using thermal-based energy balance approaches. A key to an accurate estimate of H s is a robust physically-based soil resistance formulation. Here we compare the performance of two soil resistance formulations: a conventional resistance model ( r K N ) derived from field and laboratory studies which has been extensively implemented in the thermal-based Two-Source Energy Balance (TSEB) model, and a recently developed physically-based soil resistance formulation ( r H O ) that explicitly accounts for near-surface interactions affecting scalar fluxes at the soil surface in the presence of bluff-body roughness elements. Estimates of H s using the two resistance formulations were evaluated using in-situ observations from a drip-irrigated vineyard in the arid central Negev Highlands of Israel. The results indicate that the soil resistance model r H O outperforms the r K N formulation using standard model coefficients and provides robust estimates of H s independent of model calibration or parameter tuning. This offers an opportunity to advance the utility of TSEB model when applied to sparsely vegetated areas where ground-based calibration data are not available for adjusting coefficients in the r K N formulation, and potentially improves its practical applications to heterogeneous landscapes by obviating its reliance on semi-empirical coefficients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]