Comparing square root method of measuring the cardiac output by means of aortic impedance change component to Kubicek's method.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to explore a calculated method used to measure the cardiac output using the aortic impedance change component of reconstructed impedance cardiography. Methods: Routine impedance cardiography was measured using Kubicek's method with four ring electrodes. The thoracic mixed impedance changes were measured by six leads, which consisted of 15 electrodes. The aortic impedance change component was separated from six thoracic mixed impedance changes through waveform reconstruction. The square root formula used to calculate the cardiac output was deduced based on the thoracic impedance change equation and the aortic volume change hypothesis during the systole period. The cardiac outputs of 180 normal adults and 72 patients with cardiac insufficiency who could still walk freely were contrastively computed with both Kubicek's formula and the square root formula. Results: For 180 normal adults, the cardiac index (CI) computed with the square root formula was 3.60 ± 0.45 L/min/m2, with normal values ranging from 2.7 to 4.5 L/min/m2. A total of 163 cases (90.6%) had a CI in the standard range (2.7–4.3 L/min/m2) adopted in clinical applications. The CI computed with Kubicek's formula was 3.61 ± 0.86 L/min/m2, with normal values ranging from 1.9 to 5.3 L/min/m2, and only 115 cases (63.9%) had a CI in the above standard range. Among the 72 patients with cardiac insufficiency, 20 (27.8%) patients had a CI < 2.0 L/min/m2 with Kubicek's formula. Of these 20 cases, 9 cases had a CI < 1.5 L/min/m2, and 4 cases had a CI < 1.1 L/min/m2. In contrast, none of the 72 patients had a CI < 2.0 L/min/m2 with the square root formula. In addition, the influence of the chest circumference on the CI was lower for the square root formula than for Kubicek's formula. Conclusions: The CI calculated with the square root formula had a better normal value range, was more accurate for the patients with cardiac insufficiency, and was less affected by the chest circumference than the CI calculated with Kubicek's formula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]