Back to Search Start Over

Signed difference analysis: Testing for structure under monotonicity.

Authors :
Dunn, John C.
Anderson, Laura
Source :
Journal of Mathematical Psychology. Aug2018, Vol. 85, p36-54. 19p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Abstract Signed difference analysis (SDA), introduced by Dunn and James (2003), is used to derive testable consequences from a psychological model in which each dependent variable is presumed to be a monotonically increasing function of a linear or nonlinear combination of latent variables. SDA is based on geometric properties of the combination of latent variables that are preserved under arbitrary monotonic transformation and requires estimation neither of these variables nor of the monotonic functions. The aim of the present paper is to connect SDA to the mathematical theory of oriented matroids. This serves to situate SDA within an existing formalism, to clarify its conceptual foundation, and to solve outstanding conjectures. We describe the theory of oriented matroids as it applies to SDA and derive tests for both linear and nonlinear models. In addition, we show that state-trace analysis is a special case of SDA which we extend to models such as additive conjoint measurement where each dependent variable is the same unspecified monotonic function of a linear combination of latent variables. Lastly, we show how measurement error can be accommodated based on the model-fitting approach developed by Kalish et al. (2016). Highlights • Signed difference analysis is re-framed using the theory of oriented matroids. • State-trace analysis is shown to be a special case of signed difference analysis. • Additive conjoint measurement shown to be a special case of signed difference analysis. • A method to fit models in the presence of measurement error is described. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00222496
Volume :
85
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
131730057
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.07.002