Back to Search Start Over

The development and validation of a multivariable prognostic model to predict foot ulceration in diabetes using a systematic review and individual patient data meta‐analyses.

Authors :
Crawford, F.
Cezard, G.
Chappell, F. M.
Young, Matthew J.
Abbott, Caroline A.
Boulton, Andrew J. M.
Boyko, Edward J.
Seelig, Amber
Kastenbauer, Thomas
Leese, Graham P.
Monami, Matteo
Monteiro‐Soares, Matilde
Rith‐Najarian, Stephen J.
Veves, Aristidis
Stansby, Gerard P.
Sheikh, Aziz
Coates, Nikki
Jeffcoate, William J.
Leech, Nicola
Fahey, Tom
Source :
Diabetic Medicine. Nov2018, Vol. 35 Issue 11, p1480-1493. 14p. 3 Diagrams, 6 Charts.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Aims: Diabetes guidelines recommend screening for the risk of foot ulceration but vary substantially in the underlying evidence base. Our purpose was to derive and validate a prognostic model of independent risk factors for foot ulceration in diabetes using all available individual patient data from cohort studies conducted worldwide. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of individual patient data from 10 cohort studies of risk factors in the prediction of foot ulceration in diabetes. Predictors were selected for plausibility, availability and low heterogeneity. Logistic regression produced adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for foot ulceration by ulceration history, monofilament insensitivity, any absent pedal pulse, age, sex and diabetes duration. Results: The 10 studies contained data from 16 385 participants. A history of foot ulceration produced the largest OR [6.59 (95% CI 2.49 to 17.45)], insensitivity to a 10 g monofilament [3.18 (95% CI 2.65 to 3.82)] and any absent pedal pulse [1.97 (95% CI 1.62 to 2.39)] were consistently, independently predictive. Combining three predictors produced sensitivities between 90.0% (95% CI 69.9% to 97.2%) and 95.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 98.7%); the corresponding specificities were between 12.1% (95% CI 8.2% to 17.3%) and 63.9% (95% CI 61.1% to 66.6%). Conclusions: This prognostic model of only three risk factors, a history of foot ulceration, an inability to feel a 10 g monofilament and the absence of any pedal pulse, compares favourably with more complex approaches to foot risk assessment recommended in clinical diabetes guidelines. What's new?: Cohort studies to identify risk factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes have been published in the biomedical literature since the early 1990s.We assembled an international data set of risk factors collected from 16 385 individuals with diabetes who took part in cohort studies to derive and validate a prognostic model of three risk factors: a history of foot ulceration, an inability to feel a 10 g monofilament and at least one absent pedal pulse.The use of only these three risk factors in foot risk assessments during annual diabetes foot checks could reduce the amount of time spent assessing risk and thereby increase the number of people with diabetes who have checks performed.The frequency of risk assessment should be considered in future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07423071
Volume :
35
Issue :
11
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Diabetic Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
132532756
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13797