Japanese orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 5. Determination of responsiveness.

<bold>Background: </bold>In 1999, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association decided to develop a new Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The final version of the JOACMEQ, comprising 24 questions and five domains (cervical spine function (CF); upper extremity function (UF); lower extremity function (LF); bladder function (BF); and quality of life (QOL)), was established after three nationwide investigations. The fourth investigation, reported in this paper, was performed to confirm the responsiveness of the questionnaire.<bold>Methods: </bold>A total of 137 patients with cervical myelopathy were included in the study. Each patient was interviewed twice using the JOACMEQ before and after treatment. At the second interview, the patients self-rated their condition in five domains for "worse," "somewhat worse," "no change," "somewhat better," or "better," and these scores were defined as the external assessment rating. The difference of the points in five domains between the first and the second interview was calculated against each external assessment. Based on the results, substantial clinical benefit (SCB) thresholds for the JOACMEQ were determined.<bold>Results: </bold>The statistically significant median values of the acquired points were 17.5 for CF, 16.0 and 21.0 for UF, 27.0 and 20.5 for LF, 13.0 for BF, and 29.0 for QOL. After consideration of the results, the committee decided that an acquired point ≥20 could be interpreted as representing an SCB threshold for the JOACMEQ.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>We have concluded that a treatment can be judged to be effective for a patient if 1) The patient give all answers for the questions necessary to calculate the functional score of a domain and an increase of ≥20 points is obtained for that score, or 2) The functional score after treatment is > 90 points even if the answer for the unanswered questions was supposed to be the worst possible choice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]