An investigation into the durability of glycemic control in patients with type II diabetes initiated on canagliflozin or sitagliptin: A real-world analysis of electronic medical records.

<bold>Aims: </bold>The aims of this study were to assess glycemic control, weight loss, and durability of glycemic control in patients initiated on canagliflozin (CANA) versus sitagliptin (SITA).<bold>Methods: </bold>Adults with type II diabetes mellitus initiated on CANA or SITA (index date) were identified from IQVIA™ Real-World Data Electronic Medical Records - US database (03/29/2012-04/30/2016). Inverse probability of treatment weighting accounted for baseline differences between cohorts. Outcomes were compared using weighted Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves and included time to reaching HbA1c thresholds (<7%[53 mmol/mol], <8%[64 mmol/mol], <9%[75 mmol/mol]), weight loss ≥5%, failure to maintain HbA1c below threshold, new antihyperglycemic (AHA) prescription, and failure to maintain HbA1c/new AHA prescription.<bold>Results: </bold>Weighted cohorts were well balanced (NCANA = 14,542; NSITA = 15,151). CANA patients were 12-15% more likely to reach the HbA1c thresholds, 47% more likely to lose ≥5% of body weight, 31% less likely to have a new AHA prescription, 10-15% less likely to fail to maintain HbA1c, and 13-26% less likely to fail to maintain HbA1c or have a new AHA, versus SITA patients.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>CANA patients were more likely to reach HbA1c and weight loss thresholds and maintain HbA1c below threshold versus SITA patients, while being less likely to have a prescription for a new AHA, suggesting more durable glycemic control with CANA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]