Back to Search Start Over

A comparison of transgenic rodent mutation and in vivo comet assay responses for 91 chemicals.

Authors :
Kirkland, David
Levy, Dan D.
LeBaron, Matthew J.
Aardema, Marilyn J.
Beevers, Carol
Bhalli, Javed
Douglas, George R.
Escobar, Patricia A.
Farabaugh, Christopher S.
Guerard, Melanie
Johnson, George E.
Kulkarni, Rohan
Le Curieux, Frank
Long, Alexandra S.
Lott, Jasmin
Lovell, David P.
Luijten, Mirjam
Marchetti, Francesco
Nicolette, John J.
Pfuhler, Stefan
Source :
Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology & Environmental Mutagenesis. Mar2019, Vol. 839, p21-35. 15p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Highlights • In vivo comet assay compared with transgenic rodent assay for 91 chemicals. • Comparison focussed on evaluation of in vivo genotoxicity per se. • Fair to good agreement between assays in GI tract (stomach and colon) and liver. • Poor to no agreement between assays in bone marrow. Abstract A database of 91 chemicals with published data from both transgenic rodent mutation (TGR) and rodent comet assays has been compiled. The objective was to compare the sensitivity of the two assays for detecting genotoxicity. Critical aspects of study design and results were tabulated for each dataset. There were fewer datasets from rats than mice, particularly for the TGR assay, and therefore, results from both species were combined for further analysis. TGR and comet responses were compared in liver and bone marrow (the most commonly studied tissues), and in stomach and colon evaluated either separately or in combination with other GI tract segments. Overall positive, negative, or equivocal test results were assessed for each chemical across the tissues examined in the TGR and comet assays using two approaches: 1) overall calls based on weight of evidence (WoE) and expert judgement, and 2) curation of the data based on a priori acceptability criteria prior to deriving final tissue specific calls. Since the database contains a high prevalence of positive results, overall agreement between the assays was determined using statistics adjusted for prevalence (using AC1 and PABAK). These coefficients showed fair or moderate to good agreement for liver and the GI tract (predominantly stomach and colon data) using WoE, reduced agreement for stomach and colon evaluated separately using data curation, and poor or no agreement for bone marrow using both the WoE and data curation approaches. Confidence in these results is higher for liver than for the other tissues, for which there were less data. Our analysis finds that comet and TGR generally identify the same compounds (mainly potent mutagens) as genotoxic in liver, stomach and colon, but not in bone marrow. However, the current database content precluded drawing assay concordance conclusions for weak mutagens and non-DNA reactive chemicals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13835718
Volume :
839
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology & Environmental Mutagenesis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
134596834
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.01.007