Back to Search Start Over

Accuracy of Clinician Predictions of Future Self-Harm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictive Studies.

Authors :
Woodford, Rachel
Spittal, Matthew J.
Milner, Allison
McGill, Katie
Kapur, Navneet
Pirkis, Jane
Mitchell, Alex
Carter, Gregory
Source :
Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior. Feb2019, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p23-40. 18p. 1 Diagram, 6 Charts, 1 Graph.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Assessment of a patient after hospital-treated self-harm or psychiatric hospitalization often includes a risk assessment, resulting in a classification of high risk versus low risk for a future episode of self-harm. Through systematic review and a series of meta-analyses looking at unassisted clinician risk classification (eight studies; N = 22,499), we found pooled estimates for sensitivity 0.31 (95% CI: 0.18-0.50), specificity 0.85 (0.75-0.92), positive predictive value 0.22 (0.21-0.23), and negative predictive value 0.89 (0.86-0.92). Clinician classification was too inaccurate to be clinically useful. After-care should therefore be allocated on the basis of a needs rather than risk assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03630234
Volume :
49
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
134642727
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12395