Migraine Progression: A Systematic Review.

Background: Migraine is a common and often debilitating neurological disease. It can be divided into episodic and chronic subforms based on the number of monthly headache days. Because only a subset of individuals with episodic migraine (EM) progress to chronic migraine (CM) over any given time period, understanding the factors that predict the new onset of CM or "migraine progression" may provide insights into the mechanisms, pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of CM. In this review, we identify and summarize studies that report risk factors associated with the new onset of CM or related chronic headache diagnoses, group these risk factors and report the strength of evidence for the identified risk factors. Objective: To conduct a systematic review of studies that identify risk factors for the new onset of CM or related chronic headache diagnoses such as transformed migraine (TM) and chronic daily headache (CDH). Methods: Herein we summarize the findings of studies of risk factors associated with the new onset of CM/TM, CDH, or related diagnoses from the English language literature published before March 2018. The PubMed database was searched for relevant studies. Longitudinal studies with follow‐up data and case‐control studies were included in this qualitative synthesis. We report methodology, analytic criteria, and results for each manuscript and for the parent study. Next, we review the strength of evidence for each of the identified risk factors using a modified version of AB Hill's criteria for causation and rank evidence as fair, moderate, or strong. We categorized risk factors as nonmodifiable, modifiable and based on putative mechanisms. We further categorized risk factors into sociodemographics, lifestyle factors and habits, headache features, comorbid and concomitant diseases and conditions and pharmacologic treatment‐related. Finally, we review theories of the pathophysiology underlying the development of new onset chronic migraine or increasing attack frequency. Results: The PubMed search yielded 1870 records after duplicates were removed. Nine additional records were identified through expert consultation and other methods (eg, citations found as references in manuscripts identified in the literature review and through communication with the authors of manuscripts included in the review). The 1879 manuscripts were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria and 109 were found to be potentially eligible. Of 109 full‐text articles, 17 studies were identified as meeting the prespecified criteria based on the consensus of all authors. Of the 17 full texts, 13 were longitudinal cohort studies and 4 were case‐controlled studies. We found strength of evidence ranging from fair to strong for the identified risk factors. The strongest data were found for increased headache day frequency, depression, and medication overuse/high‐frequency use. Risk factors for new onset CM and CDH in children and adolescents were similar to those identified in adults. Conclusions: A range of risk factors for the new onset of CM/TM, CDH, or related chronic headache diseases were identified with the strongest data supporting increased headache day frequency, acute medication overuse/high‐frequency use and depression, which are potentially modifiable risk factors. Modifiable risk factors may provide targets for intervention. The lack of strong evidence or any evidence does not imply that there is not a relationship between a particular risk factor and new onset CM or related disease; but may indicate little or no research or that research did not have sufficient methodological rigor. In addition, it is likely that additional risk factors exist which have not yet been identified. Putative factors include pro‐inflammatory states and pro‐thrombotic states. Development of central sensitization and increased activation of the trigeminal nociceptive pathways may be drivers of the new onset of CM or CDH. Future research may include the systematic testing of interventions targeting modifiable risk factors to determine if progression can be prevented as well as continued exploration of the benefits of treating these risk factors among people with CM in an effort to increase rates of remission. Future work should also consider the natural fluctuations in headache day frequency and examine progression in terms of continuous definitions rather than or in addition to a dichotomous boundary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]