Cite
Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiation dose-equivalent radiography, multi-detector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography for finger fractures – A phantom study.
MLA
Reidelbach, Carolin Sophie, et al. “Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of Radiation Dose-Equivalent Radiography, Multi-Detector Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Finger Fractures – A Phantom Study.” PLoS ONE, vol. 14, no. 3, Mar. 2019, pp. 1–11. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213339.
APA
Reidelbach, C. S., Goerke, S. M., Leschka, S. C., Neubauer, C., Soschynski, M., Lampert, F., Zajonc, H., Kotter, E., Langer, M., & Neubauer, J. (2019). Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiation dose-equivalent radiography, multi-detector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography for finger fractures – A phantom study. PLoS ONE, 14(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213339
Chicago
Reidelbach, Carolin Sophie, Sebastian Moritz Goerke, Simon Carl Leschka, Claudia Neubauer, Martin Soschynski, Florian Lampert, Horst Zajonc, Elmar Kotter, Mathias Langer, and Jakob Neubauer. 2019. “Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of Radiation Dose-Equivalent Radiography, Multi-Detector Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Finger Fractures – A Phantom Study.” PLoS ONE 14 (3): 1–11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213339.