Back to Search Start Over

Early experience with Watson for oncology in Korean patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors :
Kim, Eui Joo
Woo, Hyun Sun
Cho, Jae Hee
Sym, Sun Jin
Baek, Jeong-Heum
Lee, Won-Suk
Kwon, Kwang An
Kim, Kyoung Oh
Chung, Jun-Won
Park, Dong Kyun
Kim, Yoon Jae
Source :
PLoS ONE. 3/25/2019, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p1-10. 10p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Watson for oncology (WFO) is a cognitive computing system providing decision support. We evaluated the concordance rates between the treatment options determined by WFO and those determined by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Methods: We reviewed the medical charts of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer who visited the MDT at a single tertiary medical center from November 2016 to April 2017. WFO classified the treatment options for specific patients into three categories: ‘Recommended’, ‘For consideration’, and ‘Not recommended’. Concordance rates between the WFO- and MDT-determined chemotherapy options, and the factors that potentially influence the concordance rate, were analyzed. Results: Sixty-nine patients with colorectal cancer met with the MDT from Nov. 2016 to Feb. 2017. The mean age of the patients was 62 years (range: 34–86 years), and more patients were male (47/69) than female. Of the 69 patients, 51 (73.9%) were diagnosed with colon cancer, of whom 46.4% received the same regimen recommendation from WFO (‘Recommended’) as they did from the MDT. After inclusion of the ‘For consideration’ category from WFO, the concordance rate increased to 87.0%. The concordance rate between MDT and NCCN guidelines was 97.1%, and that between the WFO and NCCN guidelines was 88.4%. The concordance rates between WFO and MDT were significantly lower in patients with stage II, IIIC, or IV disease (P<0.001), and the colorectal cancer stage was the only statistically significant factor discriminating between WFO and MDT. Conclusions: The concordance rate between chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer determined by MDT versus WFO recommendations was 46.4%. After including the ‘For consideration’ category from WFO, the concordance rate increased to 88.4%. Further modification and improvement of the WFO prioritizing algorithm used to recommend treatment may increase the usefulness of WFO in the clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
14
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
135528864
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213640