Back to Search Start Over

Abstract 17257: Does Repeat Imaging Validate Visual Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Non-Electrocardiogram Gated Chest Computed Tomography?

Authors :
Koop, Hans
Kirsch, Jacobo
Berman, Kelsey
Martinez, Felipe
Source :
Circulation. 2018 Supplement, Vol. 138, pA17257-A17257. 1p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Aim: To investigate if estimation of the amount of calcium in the coronary system utilizing a visual coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) system (Kirsch et al. Detection of coronary calcium during standard chest computed tomography correlates with multi-detector computed tomography coronary artery calcium score) in non - electrocardiogram (ECG) gated chest computed tomography (CT) scans maintains its strong correlation with the Agatston CACS on dedicated ECG gated cardiac CT exams across two or more points in time per patient. Methods: A visual scoring system (Weston score, WCS) was previously developed assigning a score (0-3, total score 0-12) for each coronary vessel including the left main trunk. Predetermined score cutoffs in both Agatston and Weston scoring methods were designated for risk stratification. Following institutional review board approval, we retrospectively analyzed 127 total body CT scans on 53 low-risk patients referred by executive health who had received repeat CT scans between 2007 and 2018 and compared the traditional Agatston CACS with the Weston score. Analysis: The data were gathered from a total of 53 executive health patients ages 33 to 71, with an average age of 51. 83.6% were male and 16.4% were female. 118 scans were examined, taken between 307 and 2,792 days apart, with an average of 937 days between scans. The Weston and Agatston scores predicted the same risk classification for 79.7% of the first set of scans, with 10.2% uprisked and 10.2% downrisked by their Weston scores. For the second set of scans, 78.0% had the same classification, with 10.2% uprisked and 11.9% downrisked by their Weston scores. Weston scores predicted 100% of scans within one risk classification of the corresponding Agatston score across all pairs of scans.The average CACS utilizing the Agatston scoring method was 54.3, with a standard deviation of 148.6 due to a large positive skew in the data. The corresponding Weston scores had an average of 1.1, with a standard deviation of 2.14. Conclusion: A visual CACS system (WCS) performed on non-gated CT scans allows risk stratification for cardiac events in a similar manner as the Agatston CACS on ECG-gated CT scans even at separate points in time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00097322
Volume :
138
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Circulation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
135767357
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.138.suppl_1.17257