Back to Search Start Over

Cost‐effectiveness of the utilization of "good practice" or the lack thereof according to a bronchiolitis evidence‐based clinical practice guideline.

Authors :
Rodriguez‐Martinez, Carlos E.
Sossa‐Briceño, Monica P.
Castro‐Rodriguez, Jose A.
Source :
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. Aug2019, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p682-688. 7p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 1 Graph.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Rationale, aims, and objectives: The aim of the present study was to determine the cost‐effectiveness of the utilization of "good practice" according to a bronchiolitis clinical practice guideline (CPG) in a population of infants hospitalized for acute bronchiolitis. Method: A decision‐analysis model was developed in order to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of the utilization of "good practice" compared with the lack of use of "good practice" according to a bronchiolitis evidence‐based CPG. The effectiveness parameters and costs of the model were obtained from electronic medical records. The main outcome was the readmission of the patients within 10 days of post discharge. Results: Compared with lack of "good practice," the utilization of "good practice" in the diagnosis and management of patients with bronchiolitis was associated with both fewer patients readmitted within 10 days of post discharge (0.88 vs 0.99 on average per patient) and lower costs (US$1529.3 versus $1709.1 average cost per patient), thus leading to dominance. Results were robust to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Compared with lack of "good practice," the utilization of "good practice" in the diagnosis and management of acute bronchiolitis according to a bronchiolitis CPG is a dominant strategy because it involves both fewer patients readmitted within 10 days of post discharge and lower costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13561294
Volume :
25
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
137375538
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13157