Back to Search Start Over

The response of soil respiration to thinning was not affected by understory removal in a Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantation.

Authors :
Li, Renshan
Zheng, Wenhui
Yang, Qingpeng
Zhang, Weidong
Chi, Yonggang
Wang, Peng
Xu, Ming
Guan, Xin
Chen, Longchi
Wang, Qingkui
Wang, Silong
Source :
Geoderma. Nov2019, Vol. 353, p47-54. 8p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Thinning and understory removal are two common silvicultural practices used in plantation ecosystems, and both are expected to influence soil respiration (R S). However, little is known about how the two practices, particularly their interaction, affect the heterotrophic (R H) and autotrophic (R A) components of R S. This knowledge gap further constrains our accurate evaluation on the carbon balance in plantations upon both thinning and understory removal, because the two practices are often conducted simultaneously in plantation management. Thus, we partitioned R S into R H and R A using trenched plots in a Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantation subject to thinning and understory removal. The R S and its two components were measured in 2013 and 2014 at approximately monthly intervals. The potential control factors such as soil temperature, soil moisture and soil chemical properties were also determined. We found that thinning marginally significantly (P = 0.059) increased R S in 2013 by 17.32%, while it had no influence on R S in 2014 (P > 0.1), indicating that the influence of thinning on R S weakened with time. Similarly, a significant increase in R H toward thinning also occurred in 2013 (by 32.5%) but not in 2014. However, R A showed no response to thinning in either year. No interaction effect between thinning and understory removal was found on R S , R H , and R A. The increased soil temperature in the thinned stands in 2013 played a key role in raising the post-thinning R H and R S in this year. Generally, the temperature sensitivity (Q 10) value of R S and its components increased in the order of R H < R S < R A regardless of treatment. The Q 10 value of R S showed negligible variation among different treatments, and thus was likely not affected by thinning, understory removal, or their interactions. The results highlighted that understory removal in thinned stands would not exacerbate soil carbon emission in this plantation. • The effect of thinning on the soil respiration (R S) weakened over time. • The response of R S to thinning was mainly driven by the heterotrophic respiration. • Soil temperature played a key role in regulating the effect of thinning on the R S. • No interaction between understory removal and thinning was found on the R S. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00167061
Volume :
353
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Geoderma
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
137850932
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.025