Back to Search
Start Over
Quantifying Scholarly Output: Contribution Studies and Productivity Studies in Sociology Since 1970.
- Source :
-
American Sociologist . Sep2019, Vol. 50 Issue 3, p430-436. 7p. 2 Charts. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- This paper identifies two contrasting approaches to the quantitative measurement of scholarly output, emphasizing the distinction between contribution studies and productivity studies. Contribution studies are those in which the investigator starts with a well-defined list of publication outlets, recording all contributions to that literature by all authors, whomever they might be. In contrast, productivity studies are those in which the investigator starts with a well-defined list of contributors, recording all their scholarly output, wherever it might have appeared. We apply this conceptual model to sociology by examining the key characteristics of 25 relevant studies published since 1970. Nine are contribution studies, twelve are productivity studies, and four are too limited in scope to fall into either category. We conclude by discussing the implications of the contribution/productivity distinction for sociology and other disciplines—in particular, the problems that may arise when contribution studies are used to evaluate scholarly productivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *PRODUCTION (Economic theory)
*SOCIOLOGY
*SCHOLARS
*LITERATURE
*PUBLICATIONS
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00031232
- Volume :
- 50
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- American Sociologist
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 138200232
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9400-6