Back to Search Start Over

Using spotlight observations to predict resource selection and abundance for white‐tailed deer.

Authors :
Kaminski, Dan J.
Harms, Tyler M.
Coffey, Jim M.
Source :
Journal of Wildlife Management. Sep2019, Vol. 83 Issue 7, p1565-1580. 16p. 5 Charts, 5 Graphs, 1 Map.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Spotlight surveys for white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) can yield large presence‐only datasets applicable to a variety of resource selection modeling procedures. By understanding how populations distribute according to a given resource for a reference area, density and abundance can be predicted across new areas assuming the relationship between habitat quality (measured by an index of selection) and species distribution are equivalent. Habitat‐based density estimators have been applied to wildlife species and are useful for addressing conservation and management concerns. Although achieving reliable population estimates is a primary goal for spotlighting studies, presence‐only models have yet to be applied to spotlight data for estimating habitat selection and abundance for deer. From 2012 to 2017, we conducted spring spotlight surveys in each of 99 counties in Iowa, USA, and collected spatial locations for 20,149 groups of deer (n = 71,323 individuals). We used a resource selection function (RSF) based on deer locations to predict the relative probability of use for deer at the population level and to estimate statewide abundance. The number of deer observed statewide increased significantly with increasing RSF value for all years and the mean RSF value along survey transects explained 59% of the variability in county‐level deer counts, indicating that a functional response between habitat quality and deer distribution existed at landscape scales. We applied our RSF to a habitat‐based density estimator (extrapolation) and zero‐inflated Poisson (ZIP) and negative binomial (ZINB) count models to predict statewide abundance from spotlight counts. Population estimates for 2012 were variable, indicating that atypical weather conditions may affect spotlight counts and population estimates in some years. For 2013–2017, we predicted a mean population of 439,129 (95% CI ∼ ± 55,926), 440,360 (∼ ± 43,676), and 465,959 (∼ ± 51,242) deer across years for extrapolation, ZIP, and ZINB models, respectively. Estimates from all models were not significantly different than estimates from an existing deer population accounting model in Iowa for 2013 and 2016, and differed by <76,000 deer for all models from 2013–2017. Extrapolation and ZIP models performed similarly and differed by <2,897 deer across all years, whereas ZINB models showed inconsistencies in model convergence and precision of estimates. Our results indicate that presence‐only models are capable of producing reliable and precise estimates of resource selection and abundance for deer at broad landscape scales in Iowa and provide a tool for estimating deer abundance in a spatially explicit manner. © 2019 The Wildlife Society. Spotlight observations applied to presence‐only modeling techniques produced reliable and precise estimates of resource selection and population abundance for white‐tailed deer in Iowa, USA. Presence‐only models allow for the evaluation of environmental factors influencing spotlight counts for deer and provide a means for predicting abundance in a spatially explicit manner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0022541X
Volume :
83
Issue :
7
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Wildlife Management
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138312455
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21729