Back to Search Start Over

The effect of different sampling and recall periods in the CAHPS Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) survey.

Authors :
Hargraves, J. Lee
Cosenza, Carol
Elliott, Marc N.
Cleary, Paul D.
Source :
Health Services Research. Oct2019, Vol. 54 Issue 5, p1036-1044. 9p. 3 Charts.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>To examine the effect of changing the sampling and reference periods for the CAHPS® Clinician & Group Survey from 12 to 6 months.<bold>Data Sources/study Setting: </bold>Adult patients with a visit in the last 12 months to New England community health centers.<bold>Study Design: </bold>We randomly assigned patients to receive a survey with either a 12- or 6-month recall period.<bold>Data Collection/extraction Methods: </bold>Questionnaires were mailed to patients, with a second questionnaire mailed to nonrespondents, followed by six attempts to complete a telephone interview.<bold>Principal Findings: </bold>If the sampling criterion was a visit in the last 6 months, 9 percent of those with a visit in the last 12 months would not have been surveyed. A total of 1837 patients completed 6-month surveys (44.9 percent response rate); 588 completed 12-month surveys (46.0 percent response rate). Shortening the reference from 12 to 6 months reduced the proportion of respondents reporting a blood test, X-ray, or other tests. Adjusting for respondent characteristics, the most positive response was selected more often on the 6-month survey for 12 out of 13 questions, and three of these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Surveys using a 6-month recall period may yield slightly higher scores than surveys with a 12-month recall period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00179124
Volume :
54
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Health Services Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138541113
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13173