Back to Search Start Over

Properties and performance of photocatalytic CeO2, TiO2, and CeO2–TiO2 layered thin films.

Authors :
Kumar, Vishesh
Chen, Wen-Fan
Zhang, Xichao
Jiang, Yue
Koshy, Pramod
Sorrell, Charles Christopher
Source :
Ceramics International. Dec2019:Part A, Vol. 45, p22085-22094. 10p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

CeO 2 , TiO 2 , and CeO 2 –TiO 2 layered thin films of different compositions were deposited on polished fused silica glass substrates using spin coating and then annealed at 550 °C for 1 h. Poorly crystalline fluorite-type CeO 2 and anatase-type TiO 2 were the only phases detected. The valence effects for Ce are attributed to intervalence charge transfer (IVCT) while those for TiO 2 are attributed to simultaneous Ti4+ → Ti3+ redox and IVCT. Contamination of the grain boundaries by Si from the substrate is likely to have contributed to blockage of surface-active sites. While the roughnesses of the former thin films exhibited the expected direct correlation with the grain size, those of the latter two types of thin films showed a converse relation, suggesting that the grain boundaries of the layered TiO 2 thin films included a recrystallized CeO 2 –TiO 2 invariant point liquid and/or a CeO 2 –TiO 2 –SiO 2 glass. These would have derived from the other sources of grain boundary contamination, which are Si contamination from the substrate and/or exsolved CeO 2 beyond the solubility limit of TiO 2. The UV–Vis spectra demonstrated two principal types of curves, with the CeO 2 and higher TiO 2 concentration giving typical spectra with sharp absorption edges while those of the lower TiO 2 concentration indicated highly defective nanostructures with diffuse absorption edges. These data support the conclusion that CeO 2 initially decreases the E g by enhancing nucleation and recrystallization through defect formation but subsequently increases the E g through supersaturation and consequent lattice distortion. The CeO 2 thin films exhibited much worse photocatalytic performances than those of the TiO 2 thin films, although no significant differences between the TiO 2 thin films and the CeO 2 –TiO 2 layered thin films were apparent, which probably resulted from the competing effects of blockage of the active sites on the grain boundaries and the extent of recrystallization of the thin film phases, the latter of which is more significant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02728842
Volume :
45
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Ceramics International
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
139097597
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.225