Back to Search Start Over

Primary ACL reconstruction using the LARS device is associated with a high failure rate at minimum of 6-year follow-up.

Authors :
Tulloch, Scott John
Devitt, Brian Meldan
Porter, Tabitha
Hartwig, Taylor
Klemm, Haydn
Hookway, Sam
Norsworthy, Cameron John
Source :
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. Nov2019, Vol. 27 Issue 11, p3626-3632. 7p. 2 Charts, 1 Graph.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

<bold>Purpose: </bold>The Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS®) is a synthetic ligament consisting of fibres made of polyethylene terephthalate. Despite the LARS being used as an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) device for nearly 30 years and the well-documented complications from earlier synthetic ligament designs, there is a paucity of published medium- to long-term results. The aim of this study is to report the clinical and functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction using the LARS at a minimum follow-up of 6 years.<bold>Methods: </bold>Results of a single surgeon's entire cohort of 55 patients who underwent primary LARS ACL surgery were reviewed at a median of 7.8 years (6.0-9.4). Patient-reported outcome measures including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were collected and clinical assessment consisted of range of motion (ROM) and the KT-1000 arthrometer to assess the side-side difference in the operative and non-operative knee. Mechanical failures of the graft were confirmed at revision surgery and a survivorship analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.<bold>Results: </bold>The overall mechanical failure rate was 17/51 (33.3%) with ruptures occurring at a median 3.9 years (0.6-8.8 years) following primary LARS ACL surgery. Secondary operative procedures were performed in 39.2% of patients. For intact grafts, there was no statistically significant difference is side-to-side ROM or anterior knee laxity and subjective scores revealed a median IKDC subjective score of 85.1 (26.4-100) and SF-36 physical component score of 94.1.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The rates of LARS ACL construct failure (33.3%) in this cohort are high and based on these results the LARS should not be considered as a graft option for primary ACL reconstruction.<bold>Level Of Evidence: </bold>III, cohort study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09422056
Volume :
27
Issue :
11
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
139215783
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05478-3