Back to Search Start Over

Impact of High-Frequency HLA Haplotypes on Clinical Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors :
Kawase, Takakazu
Tanaka, Hidenori
Kojima, Hiroto
Uchida, Naoyuki
Ohashi, Kazuteru
Fukuda, Takahiro
Ozawa, Yukiyasu
Ikegame, Kazuhiro
Eto, Tetsuya
Mori, Takehiko
Miyamoto, Toshihiro
Hidaka, Michihiro
Shiratori, Souichi
Takanashi, Minoko
Atsuta, Yoshiko
Ichinohe, Tatsuo
Kanda, Yoshinobu
Kanda, Junya
Source :
Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation. Dec2019, Vol. 25 Issue 12, p2482-2489. 8p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

• High-frequency HLA haplotypes are protective against cytomegalovirus (CMV) after allogenic transplant. • Increased care for CMV is needed for recipients with low-frequency HLA haplotypes. • Part of HLA haplotype distribution may have been shaped by protectivity against CMV. Some studies support the hypothesis that HLA genes and haplotypes evolved by natural selection through their protective abilities against specific infectious pathogens. However, very little is known regarding the impact of high-frequency HLA haplotypes on the risk of relevant infectious diseases among a given ethnic group. We evaluated the impact of high-frequency HLA haplotypes on cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in a Japanese population as a model of infectious disease that has coexisted with humans. A total of 21,127 donor-patient pairs were analyzed. HLA-A-B-DRB1 haplotypes were estimated using the maximum probability algorithm. Seven haplotypes with >1% frequency were defined as high-frequency haplotypes (HfHPs). Homozygotes of HfHP and heterozygotes had significantly lower risk of CMV reactivation and infection (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.88, P =.009 and HR = 0.93, P =.003, respectively) than homozygotes of low-frequency HLA haplotypes (LfHPs). In subgroup analyses of a different donor source, these associations were statistically significant in unrelated donor transplants. Finally, CMV risk for homozygotes and heterozygotes of each HfHP was compared with that of homozygotes of LfHPs. The 2 most predominant HfHP groups (A*24:02-B*52:01-DRB1*15:02 group and A*24:02-B*07:02-DRB1*01:01 group) had a significantly lower risk of CMV reactivation and infection (HR = 0.86, P <.001 and HR = 0.91, P =.033, respectively). Our findings suggest that HfHPs may be protective against CMV reactivation and infection and that increased care regarding CMV reactivation and infection may be necessary for patients with LfHP after allo-HSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10838791
Volume :
25
Issue :
12
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
140096340
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.042