MOŽE LI HRVATSKA ANAFORA SVOJ BITI DALEKOMETNA? ODGOVOR NA TEMELJU ANALIZE INFINITIVNIH DOPUNA.

The aim of this paper is to question the locality of the possessive anaphor svoj. In some Slavic languages (possessive) anaphors behave like long-distance anaphors in infinitival clause (cfr. Faltz 1985, Pica 1987, Rappaport 1986, Dotlac?il 2005, Reinders- -Machowska 1991). In this paper we tackle the possibility that also Croatian svoj might display long-distance binding in that context. In the analysis we follow the classification of infinitival complements into restructuring and non-restructuring ones: while the former are generated as VP complements, the latter are clause complements (cfr. Rizzi 1976, Wurmbrand 2003, Grano 2015, Landau 2000). On the basis of two criteria - the (im)possibility of licensing negative polarity items and of introducing both infinitival and finite complements - we propose a new classification of Croatian verbs taking infinitival complements which show that svoj cannot be bound outside its governing category. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]