Back to Search Start Over

Trial Forge Guidance 2: how to decide if a further Study Within A Trial (SWAT) is needed.

Authors :
Treweek, Shaun
Bevan, Simon
Bower, Peter
Briel, Matthias
Campbell, Marion
Christie, Jacquie
Collett, Clive
Cotton, Seonaidh
Devane, Declan
El Feky, Adel
Galvin, Sandra
Gardner, Heidi
Gillies, Katie
Hood, Kerenza
Jansen, Jan
Littleford, Roberta
Parker, Adwoa
Ramsay, Craig
Restrup, Lynne
Sullivan, Frank
Source :
Trials. 1/7/2020, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1-9. 9p. 3 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The evidence base available to trialists to support trial process decisions-e.g. how best to recruit and retain participants, how to collect data or how to share the results with participants-is thin. One way to fill gaps in evidence is to run Studies Within A Trial, or SWATs. These are self-contained research studies embedded within a host trial that aim to evaluate or explore alternative ways of delivering or organising a particular trial process.SWATs are increasingly being supported by funders and considered by trialists, especially in the UK and Ireland. At some point, increasing SWAT evidence will lead funders and trialists to ask: given the current body of evidence for a SWAT, do we need a further evaluation in another host trial? A framework for answering such a question is needed to avoid SWATs themselves contributing to research waste.This paper presents criteria on when enough evidence is available for SWATs that use randomised allocation to compare different interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subjects

Subjects :
*DECISION making
*FORGING

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17456215
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Trials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
141098758
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3980-5