Back to Search Start Over

A critical discussion of the subduction-collision model for the Neoproterozoic Araçuaí-West Congo orogen.

Authors :
Fossen, Haakon
Cavalcante, Carolina
Konopásek, Jiří
Meira, Vinicius T.
de Almeida, Renato Paes
Hollanda, Maria Helena B.M.
Trompette, Roland
Source :
Precambrian Research. Jul2020, Vol. 343, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

• The Neoproterozoic Araçuaí orogen fits an intracontinental model of mountain building. • The tectonic setting of the Rio Doce "arc" magmatism should be reconsidered. • 50 m.y. of oceanic subduction is incompatible with a confined orogenic setting. • Amphibolite of the Ribeirão da Folha Fm. is not evidence for a wide Adamastor ocean. The Neoproterozoic Araçuaí-West Congo orogen in Brazil and Congo represents a branch of the Brasiliano/Pan-African orogenic system that is considered to terminate northward into a confined cratonic environment defined by the horseshoe-shaped pre-Atlantic São Francisco-Congo craton. The prevailing interpretation is that this orogen formed as a result of 50 m.y. of subduction leading to a classical continent–continent collision. This subduction-collision model hinges on interpretation of 630–580 Ma granitoids in the core of the orogen as being arc-related, and of locally exposed mafic and ultramafic metamorphic rocks as being ophiolitic. We show that when tested beyond geochemical signature, the model has fundamental problems that cannot be accounted for. In particular, there is an insurmountable oceanic space problem in this confined setting that is overlooked in most of the current literature. There are also problems with subduction initiation, lack of unambiguous evidence for oceanic crust, no trace of any high-P metamorphism and the abrupt termination of an ocean with no realistic way to transfer the large amount of oceanic opening displacement and subsequent convergence required by the model. We conclude that the prevailing subduction-collision model cannot possibly work and argue that the existing data are more consistent with hot intracontinental orogeny. We stress the importance of building tectonic models on more than one type of data, making realistic restorations and palinspastic reconstructions, and taking into account modern geotectonic knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03019268
Volume :
343
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Precambrian Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
143172762
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105715