Missing conceptual links in the international environmental policy debate: power, time and transfer.

Over the past 20 years, scholars have examined the role policy transfer has had on the development of environmental policies across the globe. The literature in this area has discussed everything from the movement of cap-and-trade policies to the movement of rain barrels. As the name 'policy transfer' implies, studies tend to focus on the successful movement of a policy or program. Part of the reason for this focus is that studies tend to neglect the role power and time play in the transfer process. To begin addressing this, the concepts of power most commonly associated with the three faces of power debate and ideas of political time, policy time and 'chronological' time (i.e. timing, tempo, time) can help explain a range of environmental transfers (or non-transfers) better than the existing literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]