Back to Search Start Over

European agreements for nature conservation need to explicitly address wolf-dog hybridisation.

Authors :
Salvatori, Valeria
Donfrancesco, Valerio
Trouwborst, Arie
Boitani, Luigi
Linnell, John D.C.
Alvares, Francisco
Åkesson, Mikael
Balys, Vaidas
Blanco, Juan Carlos
Chiriac, Silviu
Cirovic, Dusko
Groff, Claudio
Guinot-Ghestem, Murielle
Huber, Djuro
Kojola, Ilpo
Kusak, Josip
Kutal, Miroslav
Iliopulos, Yorgos
Ionescu, Ovidiu
Majic Skrbinsek, Aleksandra
Source :
Biological Conservation. Aug2020, Vol. 248, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Hybridisation between wolves and dogs is increasingly reported in Europe. Nonetheless, no systematic survey has ever been attempted at the continental scale. We made the first assessment of wolf-dog hybridisation (WDH) occurrence in Europe and analysed how the phenomenon is addressed by international legislation and managed at the country level. We found that WDH is reported in all nine extant European wolf populations, and in 21 out of 26 countries for which we received information. The two main international legal instruments (i.e., the Habitats Directive and the Bern Convention) do not explicitly mention the threat posed by hybridisation but do provide guidance promoting control of free-ranging wolf-dog hybrids. However, we recorded poor compliance with such recommendations in most European countries, and a lack of coordination in addressing WDH among countries sharing the same wolf population. Alarmingly, we revealed a lack of well-designed and implemented country-wide genetic surveys to detect and monitor hybridisation, both relevant pre-requisites to effectively implement WDH management. By recommending criteria for an operative definition of "hybrid", we also suggest improvements to enhance WDH-related policy at the European scale. • First Europe-wide assessment of wolf-dog hybridisation (WDH). • Wolf-dog hybrids reported in 21 out of 28 countries surveyed. • Few countries have policies compliant with Bern Convention Rec. 173/2014, which encourages removal of hybrids from the wild. • Most management interventions are undertaken without reference to a clear national policy. • Few countries prescribe national genetic monitoring for early detection of WDH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00063207
Volume :
248
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Biological Conservation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
144872391
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108525