Back to Search Start Over

Real-time measurement of radionuclide concentrations and its impact on inverse modeling of 106Ru release in the fall of 2017.

Authors :
Tichý, Ondřej
Hýža, Miroslav
Šmídl, Václav
Source :
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions. 9/8/2020, p1-21. 21p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Abstract Low concentrations of 106Ru were detected across Europe at the turn of September and October 2017. The origin of 106Ru has still not been confirmed; however, current studies agree that the release occurred probably near Mayak in the southern Urals. The source reconstructions are mostly based on an analysis of concentration measurements coupled with an atmospheric transport model. Since reasonable temporal resolution of concentration measurements is crucial for proper source term reconstruction, the standard one week sampling interval could be limiting. In this paper, we present an investigation of the usability of the newly developed AMARA and CEGAM real-time monitoring systems, which are based on the gamma-ray counting of aerosol filters. These high resolution data were used for inverse modeling of the 106Ru release. We perform backward runs of the Hysplit atmospheric transport model driven with meteorological data from the global forecast system (GFS) and we construct a source-receptor sensitivity (SRS) matrix for each grid cell of our domain. Then, we use our least-squares with adaptive prior covariance (LS-APC) method to estimate possible locations of the release and the source term of the release. On Czech monitoring data, the use of concentration measurements from the standard regime and from the real-time regime is compared and better source reconstruction for the real-time data is demonstrated in the sense of the location of the source and also the temporal resolution of the source. The estimated release location, Mayak, and the total estimated source term, 237 ± 107 TBq, are in agreement with previous studies. Finally, the results based on the Czech monitoring data are validated with the IAEA reported dataset with a much better spatial resolution, and the agreement between the IAEA dataset and our reconstruction is demonstrated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18678610
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
145639242
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-205