Back to Search Start Over

A Quantitative Measurement of Physical Therapists' Empathy and Exploration of the Relationship With Practice Setting and Work Engagement.

Authors :
Starr, Julie Ann
Holmes, Mary Beth
Riley, Erin
McDonnell, Brian
Driscoll, Laura
Camarinos, James
Grabowska, Weronika
Harbaugh, Allen G.
Source :
Evaluation & the Health Professions. Dec2020, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p255-263. 9p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Clinical empathy has been studied in a number of health-care disciplines suggesting that higher practitioner empathy leads to improved patient health and wellness and improved patient outcomes. While some aspects of the physical therapist-patient relationship have been described, evidence of quantitative assessment of clinical empathy in physical therapists is scarce. To investigate the level of self-reported clinical empathy in physical therapists and its relationship to practice environment and workplace engagement, the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Provider version (JSE-HP) and the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) were used. Study participants were 123 physical therapists working full time at either an acute care setting, a rehabilitation hospital, or an outpatient clinic. These physical therapists demonstrated a mean JSE-HP score of 118.5 (9.1) and a mean OLBI score of 15.63 (3.5). This mean empathy score was found to be higher than reported empathy level of some health disciplines such as nursing and pharmacy yet lower than others such as mental health workers, psychiatrists, and pediatricians. Practice setting was not found to be a significant factor regarding empathy levels in physical therapists. As reported in previous studies, there was a positive correlation between being female and having higher empathy levels. A positive correlation was found between age and work disengagement. Finally, our hypothesis regarding a negative correlation between empathy and work disengagement was confirmed, suggesting that workplace disengagement may diminish a physical therapist's empathy, which may then negatively affect patient clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01632787
Volume :
43
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
146205208
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278719864687