Transportation strategies for a 1.5 °C world: A comparison of four countries.

• Land transportation pathways towards 1.5 °C scenario for 4 countries are presented. • The avoid/shift/improve approach is used to create a 1.5 °C scenario for each country. • Ambitious pledges in transportation will be necessary for updated countries' NDCs. • A 1.5 °C scenario will require the implementation of a wide range of policies and measures. • These will reflect commitments tovery low CO 2 vehicle technologies, energy systems, and travel patterns. Decarbonizing transportation in emerging economies will be one of the key challenges in global climate change mitigation efforts. In this paper, pathways are developed towards achieving a 1.5° degree scenario for land-transport for four emerging economies (Brazil, India, Kenya and Vietnam). The aim is to highlight the key opportunities and challenges for low-carbon transport in countries with rapidly growing mobility demand. The main focus of this paper is to reconcile actual and required emission reduction targets and develop plausible pathways to achieve these targets. The paper also identifies potential strategies and measures for these countries to follow these pathways. The analysis considers the contributions of "avoid" (cutting travel growth), "shift" (to lower CO 2 modes) and "improve" (vehicle and fuel CO 2 characteristics) interventions to decarbonisation scenarios. These scenarios aim to inform renewed Nationally Determined Contributions and shed light on the feasibility of deep decarbonisation pathways that would be in line with the Paris Agreement. Results from this study show that achieving 1.5DS would require dramatic changes in travel patterns, technology and fuels, and major intensification of current policy approaches. Decarbonization solutions will need to include greater use and investment of efficient modes, major shifts toward near-zero carbon fuels such as clean electricity, systems integration, modal shift and urban planning solutions. Although the socio-economic situations and national transport systems differ between the selected countries, some fairly similar strategies appear likely to be core to the mitigation effort, such as rapid growth in light- and heavy-duty vehicle electrification and investments in public transit systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]